Howard Fyvie’s new short film ‘The Second Day’ starts shooting tomorrow, Saturday the 27th of Jan. I am fortunate enough to be acting in it and will also be an assistant director on the second day (of the shoot).
I thought I’d upload some pics from rehearsals, costume fittings and some storyboards just to show what we’re about to shoot.
Having watched this movie on Tuesday night, I couldn’t help but churn out a quick response. I’ve just written a few thoughts down here. There are sure to be people who agree with some stuff and disagree with the rest, and I really invite your feedback and responses if you have any.
I struggle to watch movies like ‘Machine Gun Preacher’ with a critics eye. I can’t sit back and judge films that are either to do with Africa, or to do with matters of faith. I immediately switch into some other mode and am either struck to the heart, infuriated, or educated in some way. God will generally reveal something to me, teach me something or at least stir me towards Him and His cause in some way.
This film is not made by, or for Christians, so as a believer try and not sit there as if this was a theology lesson or a guide toward sound doctrine. Simply accept this for what it is… a true story of an ordinary human being… and then see what lessons can be learnt from it, or deal with any stirrings you may have in the aftermath of watching it. I don’t think it’s good enough for someone to simply dismiss this film as rubbish, or bad doctrine and then walk away. There are lessons to be learnt both good and bad. I write everything from a very humble state, will try not to make assumptions, and stand to be corrected or at least challenged on any points. These points are in no particular order and do not necessarily follow the narrative.
Firstly, I was reminded that we are missionaries. We have one life on this earth and we need to make it count for the cause of Christ. Sam Childers, the central character in this film, became a follower of Christ and had his heart stirred for the the kids in Sudan. He then went and assisted. It’s that simple at first. He did something. He initially obeyed God’s call and went to serve, the same as many others have done throughout history. Before you even comment on anything else that followed and point fingers at him, or complain that this movie simply glorified this one man (which it may have done, and I’m not advocating that), have you checked your own heart? Are you serving the poor, or evangelising to people, or even just praying for your friend, OR are you sitting on your couch pointing out where he went wrong.
I found it very interesting when Sam was faced with several moral decisions. Some in hindsight, we could perhaps easily spot the right choice, whereas there are others where we still perhaps can’t tell what the best thing to do was.
Three times throughout the film he is faced with the choice or helping some (but not all), or helping none. First is when he chooses to let as many children as he can come and sleep inside. The second, and toughest, was when he takes an abandoned group back to the orphanage but is forced to leave the rest in the bush for the night. They are slaughtered before he can get back for them. What a choice he was faced with. He couldn’t see all ends. At that point he made a tough choice, and I can only begin to imagine the weight and strain that this man felt.
You them might want to zone out and dismiss this as just another movie about ‘a good white American coming to help poor Africans’. Even if it is, you still have a choice! You can get upset with the filmmakers and American’s for wanting to come over here and look like heroes! You can do that. But I ask you, have you checked your heart? Have you gone there? Have you gotten off your butt and just walked to the underprivileged areas in your own city, let alone leaving your family to travel half way across the world. Have you seen the need? Before you criticize him and others, check yourself. Don’t be immediately critical.
There is SUCH a need in this world… for God’s word and Gospel to be heard and for us to be hands and feet in helping those who are in need. There is a bigger picture, far removed from our world of comfy sofas and capuccinos.
This man was not perfect. Did he do things wrong? I think so, and the question we must ask is – what can we learn? My opinion is that he got far to caught up in DOING God’s work that he lost sight of God himself. I base this purely on what I saw in the film and nothing else. His decision to go out and actively attack guys and seek them out because of a spirit of vengeance is wrong in my opinion. The debate (and I’ve been a part of one) of whether or not killing in defense of the innocent can be had and I’m free to argue about it, but in many parts of the film he was not acting out of desperation. He was actively killing guys and I don’t agree with that. Had he been truly obeying the Holy Spirit and walking close with Him, I would have made some different decisions.
Finally, his neglect of his family was also something that struck me. There is one scene where he harshly denies his daughter a limo ride for her prom. On one hand, it must have been a tough thing, after seeing what he has, and knowing how that same money could be used to save lives. On the other hand however, is the fact that as a Christian man, and his major responsibility is first and foremost to his family – His wife and then his daughter. He very much lost sight of this and suffered because of it. What was his solution? Practically, I won’t offer one. But somewhere in the midst of it all he lost sight of God and his family and became a slave to the WORK.
My only solution would have been to stay close to God, stay close to his Spirit and love Jesus. I do not believe God would have wanted such issues of abandonment within a family. That is the lesson I would take from this. Don’t become a slave to DOING STUFF for God and lose the heart behind it.
These are just a bunch of thought’s I had. This is not a sermon. These are not lecture notes. These are the first thoughts off the top of my head.
Machine Gun Preacher – A lesson in good theology? No. A perfect example of how to be a missionary? No.
You can hate this film. You can disagree with much of it’s content, but don’t be cynical and just ignore it. Don’t fold your arms, shut it out and pass up the opportunity to learn something…
A bunch of cool promotional images for The Avengers and the ‘shot in Cape Town, set in Seattle’ superhero film Chronicle.
Start playing HERE.
Review – 3 Stars
by Kyle St John Peters
If I could sum this movie up in a word, I would choose fine. It’s fine. The first film was a great romp in a similar vein to ‘Raiders of the Last Ark’ and this second film is basically just more of the same. It retains everything that we loved about the last one, from the unique style, to the fight scenes, to Downey Jr.’s great take on the character. The chemistry between Law and Downey is also as spot on as ever.
Unfortunately though, what is the film’s strength is also it’s weakness… it’s the same as the original. Guy Ritchie has brought a whole lot more of the same, without really shaking it up. In fact, the plot is a bit shaken up, and a little too convoluted for my taste compared to the clear cut original.
The whole thing just feels a tad unoriginal and has relied a little too much on gags to get the humour across – Downey Jr. in dress up does eventually get old! That said however, if you liked the first one, go and give it watch – it’s not bad.
Recap on all the posters for ‘Safe House’, which stars Denzel Washington and Ryan Reynolds, and is set in Cape Town. Opens on 10 February.
Note the ‘Joburg skyline’ on the second poster… epic fail. Damn Yanks… I can just picture the conversation – ‘Our movie is set in Cape Town, we need pictures! Hurry, google pictures of Africa!’
By Kyle St John Peters
From the word go, M:I-4 is a far less intense movie than the JJ Abrams’ predecessor. This is neither a pro nor a con, but simply a fact, to put you in the correct frame of mind. Brad Bird’s (The Incredibles) live action debut is a fun, globetrotting adventure with a great twisting and winding plot. This may in fact be the top film of the franchise.
The increased element of ‘team’ in this outing really makes the film shine, and although Cruise is still clearly the star, it has completely shaken the huge problem of the “Tom Cruise ‘one man army’ show” that destroyed M:I-2. It has the best supporting players out of all the films – Renner as a mysterious ‘analyst’, Pegg as the comic relief, Patton as… uh… the woman. Cruise is on top form once again (he really is the best cinematic runner we will ever see), despite his age beginning to show up in some of the shots, and it’s great to see him sharing much of the action with the ever watchable Jeremy Renner who really is beginning to make a massive name for himself.
This time around there is also an added mystery factor with some of the characters, most intriguingly with Cruise’s Ethan Hunt. Hunt was never the person who had secrets, so it is an interesting dynamic that Bird has added, creating a slight hint of mistrust within our leading man.
The Mission: Impossible films, of course, have always been about stupendous action, and this film more than succeeds on those terms. The entire Dubai section of the film, from the vertigo inducing building scene, to the double con culminating in an awesome sandstorm foot/car chase is absolutely outstanding. What is great, is that Brad Bird is first and foremost, a storyteller. The action is worked seamlessly into the narrative, never making you feel the ‘Matrix Reloaded’ syndrome of ‘action scene.talking.action scene.talking.’ It really has a great flow to it.
I would say, most importantly, the film makes you want to run. It makes you want to kick ass. It makes you want to jump off the tallest building in the world (with ropes of course) and do crazy aerial maneuvers. In short, it makes you feel like a kid again… and that is exactly what you want. Choose to accept it.